Product
TimelineResearchLab dataDocument namingDesktop assessmentGuideline screening3D mapping and volumesGroundwater trendsEnvironmental forensicsReports, tables and figuresSite FactsPortfolio prioritization
Solutions
Site owners & operatorsConsultantsEnvironmental lawyers Use cases Industries
Offerings
PlatformExpert servicesPortfolio programs
Resources
Case studiesGlossaryBlogEnviroBench
Trust Company Contact us

78,000 site documents, renamed to one standard. With fewer errors than people.

A multinational energy company needed every scanned site document renamed to its corporate naming standard before it entered the records system. Across a 300-site portfolio, that is a job nobody has time for.

  • Multinational energy company
  • Records management
  • 300-site portfolio

260

documents on one site

300

sites in the portfolio

78,000

documents to rename

13,000

hours of manual work at 10 minutes a document, about seven people full time for a year

13%

fewer naming errors than people, in a blind test of 251 documents

The challenge

The company keeps its environmental records to a strict corporate naming standard, set out in a multi-page written document. It is scanning decades of historical paper.

The approach

Statvis reads each document itself, not just its old file name, and applies the rules in the company's written standard to name it. The same rules are applied the same way to the first document and the 78,000th. People get tired and drift; an automated workflow does not.

Names that the standard can't settle from the document are flagged for a person to decide, rather than guessed.

How we tested it

We ran a blind test on 251 of the company's documents. Each document was named by Statvis and by people, and every name was scored against the company's written naming standard without the scorer knowing which was which. Statvis made 13% fewer naming errors than the people did.

Take control of your contaminated sites.

Bring us one site's documents. We'll show you what's in them.